|
|
|
Fox
sets
are
many
and
varied
beyond
comprehension,
but
I
only
use
a
couple
of
sets
that
are
traditional
favorites,
and
these
are
the
"dirt
hole,"
the
"flat
set,"
the
"trail
set,"
and
occasionally
the
"urine
post"
set.
These
have
served
me
well
over
the
years
and
I
have
no
desire
to
complicate
things
by
adding
new
sets,
unless
they
prove
to
be
more
effective
than
the
old.
One
thing
that
I
want
to
make
clear
about
fox
traps
and
sets
is
the
fact
they
you
don't
have
to
operate
like
a
surgeon
to
catch
fox.
Craig
O'Gorman,
the
well
known
pro
trapper
(and
former
USDA
trapper)
from
Montana
helped
me
to
realize
that
I
did
not
have
to
go
around
with
rubber
gloves
and
surgically
sterilized
traps
to
nail
fox
or
coyotes,
and
the
first
time
I
caught
fox
with
a
trap
that
I
set
with
bare
hands
the
myths
began
to
recede
in
the
background.
Foreign
odors
are
the
things
that
one
must
try
to
avoid,
but
human
scent
is
not
foreign
to
animals
in
this
part
of
the
world.
O'Gorman
mentioned
the
fact
that
he
had
used
human
urine
on
a
fox
set
and
this
blew
my
mind!
In
my
youth
I
would
not
even
relieve
myself
on
the
trapline
unless
it
was
in
a
running
creek.
I
actually
tried
this
in
Montana
and
had
a
cougar
get
caught
in
the
BMI
coyote
trap
that
very
night,
of
course
it
pulled
out,
but
the
idea
that
human
urine
would
scare
every
animal
in
the
country
away
was
certainly
dismissed.
Avoid
gas
and
oil
odors
on
the
hands,
and
don't
worry
about
the
smell
of
dirt,
or
grass,
or
human
scent
at
the
set.
Traps
should
be
cleaned
and
waxed
before
season,
but
a
trap
that
has
caught
a
fox
is
just
as
ready
to
go
as
a
fresh
trap
from
the
wax
kettle
will
ever
be.
I
don't
wear
rubber
boots,
and
I
don't
use
gloves
most
of
the
time,
and
I
catch
fox
and
coyote
more
effectively
than
I
ever
did
during
the
years
that
I
used
those
techniques.
My approach to the dirt hole is a combination of sorts between the Leggett's step down version, and O'Gorman's big hole ideas. I always like the surface area of the bedded trap to be at least an inch below the surrounding soil, and I like the pan to be the lowest point in the set, due to the apparent fact that predators tend to step in the low spot, rather than the high point. This should not be drastic or overly obvious, but more gentle, and I will try to get some photos to illustrate this in the coming weeks. As far as the hole goes, I used a framing hammer to dig the beds for the sets in the photo above, and I simply made a very small hole with the face of the hammer. I have since grown fond of the larger holes (4 to 6 inches in diameter) that provide a lot of visual attraction. I like a little backing at the rear of the hole if it is on flat ground, but I really prefer a small mound or bank for the big hole since this provides even more visual attraction. I seldom use anything other than lure at these sets, but if I have bobcat meat available I will make use of it.
I occasionally use flat sets and urine post sets, and I like flat sets quite well with the right soil conditions, but they usually take me longer to construct than the others do, so I limit the use of these type of sets, since I am always concerned about the time issues.
Notice the second gray about 50 ft. straight behind the first gray in the foreground. This was a second double in 5 days of late January trapping. Both fox were taken in dirt holes using the small hole made with the face of my framing hammer. January and February are both great months for doubles since fox are often running in pairs at this time of year, but one should always remember that you can't catch doubles with just one trap at a location. This particular area is saturated with grays, but red fox are not nearly as abundant. Out of 11 fox in 5 nights, 10 were gray!
|
|
© 2002 All Rights Reserved Home www.alaskahunts.net/wvtraplines/index.html E-mail, info@alaskahunts.net Updated October 17, 2006 |